Comparison · Updated July 2026
Co-parenting app comparison
The four apps most separated parents end up choosing between, with real prices and the parts nobody puts on their own homepage. Braidly is newer than the other three and the table says so — a comparison you can’t verify isn’t worth reading.
| Feature | Braidly | OurFamilyWizard | TalkingParents | AppClose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who the subscription covers | One plan covers both parents | Each parent pays separately | Each parent pays separately | Free for both parents |
| Cost for a two-parent family | $129.99/yr total | $299.98–$599.76/yr | $168–$768/yr | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes — calendar, messaging, 2 children | No | Discontinued Mar 30, 2026 | Yes — full app |
| AI rewrite before you send | Yes — full rewrite suggested | ToneMeter flags tone only | Tone analysis add-on | No |
| Neutral AI mediator in-thread | Yes | No | No | No |
| Tamper-evident export | Yes — SHA-256 sealed | Yes — certified records | Yes — Unalterable Records | Yes — PDF reports |
| Kids see their own schedule | Yes — own device, own view | Limited child access | No | No |
| Read-only professional access | Included | Practitioner account | Legal-professional plan | Attorney access |
| Courtroom track record | New in 2026 | Since 2001, all 50 states | Since 2012 | Since 2015 |
Braidly vs OurFamilyWizard
The incumbent since 2001. Charges each parent separately, no free plan.
Braidly vs OurFamilyWizard →Braidly vs TalkingParents
Strong records, but the free plan ended March 30, 2026 and billing is per parent.
Braidly vs TalkingParents →Braidly vs AppClose
Genuinely free and widely court-ordered. Thinner on conflict tooling.
Braidly vs AppClose →Where Braidly genuinely wins — and where it doesn’t
Three things separate Braidly from the incumbents, and one thing doesn’t.
1. One subscription, both parents
This is the big one, and it isn’t only about money. When each parent has to buy their own subscription, one of them refuses — and the family goes back to text messages, which is the situation the app was supposed to fix. One plan removes the argument entirely.
2. AI that writes the calmer message
Competitors score your tone and warn you. Braidly drafts the version you should send instead, and lets you pick. A warning tells you that you’re about to make things worse; a rewrite tells you how not to.
3. Children get their own view
Kids see their own schedule on their own device, without seeing the parents’ messages. Most competitors treat children as a subject of the record rather than a user of it.
Where Braidly doesn’t win: track record
OurFamilyWizard has been in front of judges since 2001. TalkingParents since 2012. If your order specifically names one of them, use that one. If your attorney has a strong preference built on years of experience, that preference is worth something Braidly cannot yet offer.
Comparison questions
Which co-parenting app is cheapest for a two-parent family?
AppClose is free. Among paid apps, Braidly is the least expensive for a family because one $129.99/year subscription covers both parents, where OurFamilyWizard and TalkingParents bill each parent separately — so a two-parent family on OurFamilyWizard pays roughly $300 to $600 a year and on TalkingParents roughly $168 to $768 a year, based on their published 2026 pricing.
Does TalkingParents still have a free plan?
No. TalkingParents discontinued its free mobile tier on March 30, 2026, so all TalkingParents users now need a paid subscription. Braidly and AppClose both still offer free plans as of July 2026.
Which co-parenting app is best for high-conflict custody cases?
OurFamilyWizard has the longest courtroom track record, having been used since 2001 and ordered by courts in all 50 states, which is why many attorneys default to recommending it. Braidly is newer but offers the same tamper-evident record keeping plus AI that rewrites heated messages before they send and a neutral in-thread mediator, which target the conflict itself rather than only documenting it.
Do I need the same co-parenting app as my co-parent?
Yes — the point of these apps is a shared record, so both parents use the same one. With Braidly this costs one subscription for the pair; with OurFamilyWizard and TalkingParents each parent needs their own paid account, which is the main reason one parent often refuses and the family falls back to text messages.
Can a court order us to use a specific co-parenting app?
Yes, and courts frequently do, most often naming OurFamilyWizard, TalkingParents or AppClose. If your order names a specific app you should use that app. If your order says only that communication must go through a documented platform, any app producing timestamped, tamper-evident records — Braidly included — generally satisfies it, but confirm with your attorney.
Try Braidly free. Bring your co-parent for nothing extra.
Braidly is in private beta while we onboard families in small batches. Ask for an invite and we'll email you the moment a place opens.
Private beta · Free while in beta · We onboard families in small batches